Ted L. Robertson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice ( 2015 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00392-CV
TED L. ROBERTSON,
Appellant
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL.,
Appellees
From the 278th District Court
Walker County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1527503
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Ted L. Robertson, a pro se inmate, appeals from the dismissal of his suit
as frivolous under Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 14, which now applies to
appellate proceedings. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002(a) (West Supp. 2014);
Douglas v. Turner, 441 S.W.3d 337, 338 (Tex. App.—Waco 2013, no pet.).
Section 14.004(a) requires the inmate to file an affidavit or declaration “relating to
previous filings” in which the inmate must detail all previous actions filed pro se, other
than a suit under the Family Code, accompanied by a certified copy of the inmate’s
account statement. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004(a), (c) (West Supp. 2014).
The filings required by chapter 14 are “an essential part of the process by which
courts review inmate litigation.” Douglas, 441 S.W.3d at 339. The failure to file the
affidavit or declaration “relating to previous filings” can result in dismissal without
notice or hearing, id., even if the failure to comply with chapter 14 can be remedied.
McLean v. Livingston, 456 S.W.3d 358, 359-60 (Tex. App.—Waco 2015, pet. filed) (op. on
reh’g); see also Anderson v. Tex. Dep’t Crim. Just., --- S.W.3d ---, ---, 2015 WL 1570170, at *2
(Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 19, 2015, no pet.). Furthermore, when the inmate fails to comply
with the affidavit requirement, the court may assume that the current action is
substantially similar to one previously filed by the inmate and is thus frivolous. Id.In this appeal, Robertson did not file an affidavit or declaration “relating to
previous filings” and a certified copy of his inmate account statement. We thus dismiss
as frivolous this appeal.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
(Justice Davis dissents with a note)*
Dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed December 10, 2015
[CV06]
*(Justice Davis notes that he would notify Appellant of his section 14.004
deficiency and allow him the opportunity to cure it before dismissal. See McLean, 456
S.W.3d at 362-63 (Davis, J., dissenting); see also Anderson, --- S.W.3d at ---, 2015 WL
1570170, at *3 (Davis, J., dissenting).)
Robertson v. TDCJ Page 2