Logan Trey Field v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                               Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Nos. 04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-CR, & 04-17-00403-CR
    Logan Trey FIELD,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas
    Trial Court Nos. 5810, 5811, 5812, & 5813
    Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Karen Angelini, Justice
    Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    Irene Rios, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: September 19, 2018
    AFFIRMED, MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
    Appellant Logan Trey Field was indicted for two counts of possession of a controlled
    substance and two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. In cause
    number 5811, Field was charged with possession of marijuana in an amount of five pounds or less
    but more than four ounces; and in cause number 5812, Field was charged with possession of
    tetrahydrocannabinol in an amount of four grams or more but less than 400 grams. In cause number
    5810, Field was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver,
    specifically, hydrocodone or dihydrocodeinone, in an amount of twenty-eight grams or more but
    04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-CR, & 04-17-00403-CR
    less than 200 grams; and in cause number 5813, Field was charged with possession of a controlled
    substance with intent to deliver, specifically, cocaine, in an amount of four grams or more but less
    than 200 grams.
    Field filed motions to suppress in each case. After a hearing, the trial court denied the
    motions to suppress. Thereafter, pursuant to a plea bargain, Field pled guilty to the charges in the
    indictments. The trial court sentenced appellant to two years in the state jail division of the Texas
    Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) in cause number 5811; ten years in the institutional
    division of TDCJ in cause number 5812; fifteen years in the institutional division of TDCJ in cause
    number 5810; and thirty years in the institutional division of TDCJ in cause number 5813. In each
    case, the trial court signed a certification stating it was a plea bargain case, but Field had the right
    to appeal because matters were raised by written motion and ruled on before trial.
    Field timely filed a notice of appeal in each case. We consolidated the cases for purposes
    of briefing. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief and motions to
    withdraw. In the brief, counsel states he conducted a thorough review of the record in each case
    and concluded the appeals are frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that Field was
    provided with copies of the brief and motions to withdraw and was further informed of his right to
    review the record and file his own brief in each case. See Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Field did not file a pro se brief.
    We have reviewed the record and counsel’s briefs. We agree that these appeals are
    frivolous and without merit. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. Furthermore, we
    grant counsel’s motions to withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 85-86 (Tex. App.—San
    Antonio 1997, no pet.); 
    Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177
    n.1.
    -2-
    04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-CR, & 04-17-00403-CR
    No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Field wish to seek further review of these
    cases by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file petitions
    for discretionary review or file pro se petitions for discretionary review. Any petition for
    discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion;
    or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the
    requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Do not publish
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-17-00400-CR

Filed Date: 9/19/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2018