in Re Ronald Scott Catt ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
    August 23, 2018.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-18-00701-CR
    IN RE RONALD SCOTT CATT, Relator
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    400th District Court
    Fort Bend County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 12-DCR-061927
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On August 9, 2018, relator Ronald Scott Catt filed a petition for writ of
    mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see
    also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the
    Honorable Maggie Perez-Jaramillo, presiding judge of the 400th District Court of
    Fort Bend County, to County to rule on relator’s Motion to Release Property and
    motions seeking a ruling on that motion. Relator also filed a motion asking our court
    to take judicial notice of the trial court’s record.
    The Motion to Release Property asks the trial court to release property of
    relator that was seized pursuant to a search warrant, including two automobiles and
    two motorcycles. The property at issue was forfeited to the State in a civil forfeiture
    proceeding. See Catt v. DeLozier, No. 14-16-00524-CV, 
    2017 WL 2384636
    , at *1
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 1, 2017, pet. denied). Because the property
    at issue has been forfeited relator’s Motion to Release Property and his petition for
    writ of mandamus are moot.
    The trial court is not required to rule on a motion that has become moot. See
    In re Douglas, No. 14-10-00820-CV, 
    2010 WL 3504760
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—
    Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 9, 2010, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.); Davis v. West,
    
    433 S.W.3d 101
    , 109 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet. denied); Palacios
    v. Rayburn, 
    516 S.W.2d 292
    , 294 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1974, no writ).
    The court will not issue mandamus “if for any reason it would be useless or unavailing.”
    Dow Chem. Co. v. Garcia, 
    909 S.W.2d 503
    , 505 (Tex. 1995).
    Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion to
    take judicial notice as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-18-00701-CR

Filed Date: 8/23/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/24/2018