in Re: McBride Operating, LLC ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                         NO. 12-22-00279-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                    §
    MCBRIDE OPERATING, LLC,                                   §   ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR                                                   §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    McBride Operating, LLC filed this original proceeding to challenge Respondent’s denial
    of its Rule 91a motion to dismiss. 1 On December 7, 2022, this Court conditionally granted the
    petition and directed Respondent to vacate his August 18, 2022 order denying the motion to
    dismiss, and in its stead, to issue an order granting the motion to dismiss, dissolving the
    temporary injunction, and dismissing the case. By an order filed with this Court on December
    15, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
    Opinion delivered December 22, 2022.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    Respondent is the Honorable James A. Payne, Jr., Judge of the 273rd District Court in Shelby County,
    1
    Texas. The Real Parties in Interest are Terry Allen, Jan Allen, and Cypress Creek Farms, LLC.
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    DECEMBER 22, 2022
    NO. 12-22-00279-CV
    MCBRIDE OPERATING, LLC,
    Relator
    V.
    HON. JAMES A. PAYNE, JR.,
    Respondent
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by
    McBride Operating, LLC; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-22-00279-CV and the
    defendant in trial court cause number 21CV35791, pending on the docket of the 273rd Judicial
    District Court of Shelby County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed
    herein on October 19, 2022, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion
    of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and
    ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as
    moot.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-22-00279-CV

Filed Date: 12/22/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/26/2022