David Duran v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •              In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-22-00228-CR
    ___________________________
    DAVID DURAN, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    On Appeal from the 211th District Court
    Denton County, Texas
    Trial Court No. F-2003-0427-C
    Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
    Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    David Duran attempts to appeal the trial court’s order concluding that Duran is
    abusing the writ process and recommending that the Court of Criminal Appeals take
    no action on Duran’s twentieth Article 11.07 application for a post-conviction writ of
    habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07. Having no jurisdiction over
    Article 11.07 writs, we dismiss Duran’s attempted appeal.
    From Duran’s notice of appeal and other documents filed with it, we see that
    he filed an Article 11.07 application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus and
    that he is ostensibly trying to appeal the trial court’s order concluding that Duran is
    abusing the writ process and recommending that the Court of Criminal Appeals take
    no action on the application. However, we have no jurisdiction over post-conviction
    applications under Article 11.07. See id.; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    ,
    243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (stating that the Court of Criminal
    Appeals is the “only court with jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony
    proceedings”); Leyhe v. State, No. 02-20-00154-CR, 
    2021 WL 126369
    , at *1 (Tex.
    App.—Fort Worth Jan. 14, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“We do not have jurisdiction
    over matters related to post[-]conviction relief from an otherwise final felony
    conviction.”).
    We notified Duran of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over his appeal and
    stated that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we
    2
    would dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We received no response from Duran.
    Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
    Per Curiam
    Do Not Publish
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    Delivered: December 15, 2022
    1
    On September 28, 2022, the Court of Criminal Appeals disposed of Duran’s
    application without action and entered, instead, its customary abuse-of-writ order that
    it first entered after Duran’s seventh application.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-22-00228-CR

Filed Date: 12/15/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/19/2022