Renovation Genius, LLC v. Beverly Brooks ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                  COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:      Renovation Genius, LLC v. Beverly Brooks
    Appellate case number:    01-21-00063-CV
    Trial court case number: 1129720
    Trial court:              County Civil Court at Law No 4 of Harris County
    Appellee’s motion to reinstate the above-referenced appeal is GRANTED. It is ordered
    that the above-referenced appeal is REINSTATED on the Court’s active docket.
    A question of jurisdiction remains, as set out in the Court’s prior order issued on October
    13, 2022. More specifically, appellee has moved to dismiss the above-referenced appeal on the
    ground that appellant’s February 1, 2021 notice of appeal was not timely filed. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 26.1(a)(1) (notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after judgment is signed if any party
    timely files motion for new trial). A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an
    appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but
    within the 15-day extension period provided by rule 26.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3; Verburgt
    v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617–18 (Tex. 1997). Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within this
    15-day period, but appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of
    appeal in a timely manner. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 26.3; Jones v. City of Hous., 
    976 S.W.2d 676
    , 677 (Tex. 1998) (holding appellant should be able to prosecute appeal despite notice
    of appeal filed within Verburgt period if appellant can reasonably explain need for extension).
    Accordingly, the Court requests that appellant respond to appellee’s motion to
    dismiss within 10 days of the date of this order. Appellant is notified that unless you respond
    in writing, by the deadline specified, providing a reasonable explanation for untimely filing
    the notice of appeal, the appeal may be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). You must
    respond in writing even if you have previously claimed your notice of appeal was timely filed.
    Judge’s signature: /s Sarah Beth Landau
    Acting individually
    Date: December 1, 2022
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-21-00063-CV

Filed Date: 12/1/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/5/2022