C. M. Hamner v. Oxford , 22 S.W.2d 1119 ( 1929 )

This was an automobile collision suit, wherein appellee recovered judgment against appellant for the sum of $217.36 as damages to his automobile. Appellant's propositions go only to the extent of challenging the jury's verdict, assessing the damages and convicting him of negligence, as being without support. These propositions are denied. The verdict in all respects has abundant support in the evidence.

Affirmed.