Pervis Ray Cartwright v. Ann Harris Bennett and Doug Eustice ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued March 26, 2020
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-18-00986-CV
    ———————————
    PERVIS RAY CARTWRIGHT, Appellant
    V.
    ANN HARRIS BENNETT AND DOUG EUSTICE, Appellees
    On Appeal from the Count Civil Court at Law No. 2
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Case No. 1108953
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Pervis Ray Cartwright, filed a notice of appeal on October 24, 2018
    attempting to appeal from the trial court’s June 5, 2018 order dismissing the
    underlying action. Appellee Doug Eustice subsequently filed a “Response to
    Appellant’s Notice of Appeal” requesting that our Court dismiss the appeal for want
    of jurisdiction because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely. We construe
    appellee’s pleading as a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. We grant the
    motion and dismiss the appeal.
    Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the final judgment
    is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended
    to ninety days after the date the judgment is signed if, within thirty days after the
    judgment is signed, any party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify
    the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for
    findings of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); TEX. R. CIV. P.
    329b(a), (g). The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within
    fifteen days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a
    motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3. A motion for extension of
    time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of
    appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day extension
    period provided by Rule 26.3. See TEX .R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner,
    
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617–18 (Tex. 1997).
    Here, the trial court signed the judgment from which appellant appeals on June
    5, 2018 and no motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal
    was due by July 5, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Appellant’s October 24, 2018
    notice of appeal was filed over three months after the deadline. Without a timely
    2
    filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 25.1. Accordingly, appellee moved to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction
    due to the untimely notice of appeal. Appellant failed to respond.
    We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-18-00986-CV

Filed Date: 3/26/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/27/2020