Justin Edward Panus v. State ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •        TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-20-00099-CR
    Justin Edward Panus, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
    NO. 16-2610-K368, THE HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING
    ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Justin Edward Panus, acting pro se, has appealed the district court’s denial of his
    motion for postconviction forensic DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 64.01-.05.
    However, our review of the record reflects that the ruling on Panus’s motion is not signed and
    consists only of a handwritten notation at the bottom of the motion stating “denied.” 1 A written
    and signed appealable order is a prerequisite to invoking our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 26.2(a)(1); State v. Rosenbaum, 
    818 S.W.2d 398
    , 402 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Dewalt v.
    State, 
    417 S.W.3d 678
    , 685 n.32 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, pet. ref’d).
    1
    The clerk’s record case summary has a “Judge’s Docket Entry” dated “01/17/2020”
    stating “Review of Motion for DNA Testing: Motion Denied (RK).” But that entry does not
    substitute for a signed order on the motion. Dewalt v. State, 
    417 S.W.3d 678
    , 685 n.32 (Tex.
    App.—Austin 2013, pet. ref’d) (noting that docket-sheet entries do not qualify as appealable
    orders).
    Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the district court
    for entry of a signed order as to Panus’s motion for forensic DNA testing. See Ex parte
    Crenshaw, 
    25 S.W.3d 761
    , 764 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, pet. ref’d) (noting that
    court had previously abated appeal because record did not contain written order reflecting court’s
    ruling); see also Sturgis v. State, No. 05-08-00006-CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 2045, at *4-5
    (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 24, 2010, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.) (noting that court had previously
    abated appeal because at time of appeal, trial court had not signed written order denying
    defendant’s motion for DNA testing). A supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed order
    is to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than April 30, 2020.
    It is so ordered March 31, 2020.
    Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana
    Abated and Remanded
    Filed: March 31, 2020
    Do Not Publish
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-20-00099-CR

Filed Date: 3/31/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/1/2020