in Re Frederick Q Herrod ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • DISMISSED and Opinion Filed April 6, 2020
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-20-00280-CV
    IN RE FREDERICK Q. HERROD, Relator
    Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 5
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F00-48012-SL
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Evans
    Opinion by Justice Molberg
    In this original proceeding, Frederick Q. Herrod has filed an “appeal” of his
    conviction for aggravated robbery claiming the conviction is void because the trial
    court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case.1 Because it raises a collateral
    attack on relator’s conviction, we interpret relator’s appeal as an original application
    for writ of habeas corpus.
    We do not have jurisdiction to consider an original application for writ of
    habeas corpus arising from a criminal proceeding. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.
    1
    Relator was convicted in 2000 and sentenced to a forty-five-year term of imprisonment. See Herrod
    v. State, No. 05-00-01656-CR, 
    2002 WL 227039
    (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 15, 2002, no pet.) (per curiam)
    (not designated for publication).
    art. 11.05; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d); In re Ayers, 
    515 S.W.3d 356
    , 356–
    57 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam).
    Furthermore, because relator has been convicted and is serving a term of
    imprisonment, relator’s writ application must be brought pursuant to article 11.07 of
    the code of criminal procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §§1, 3. This
    Court does not have jurisdiction to consider an article 11.07 writ application. See
    Board of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. The Eighth Court of Appeals, 
    910 S.W.2d 481
    , 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding).            An 11.07 writ
    application must be filed with the trial court and made returnable to the court of
    criminal appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §3(b); 
    Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483
    .
    We dismiss this original proceeding for want of jurisdiction.
    /Ken Molberg//
    KEN MOLBERG
    200280f.p05                                JUSTICE
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-20-00280-CV

Filed Date: 4/6/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/7/2020