in Re: Omar H. Henry ( 2020 )

DENIED and Opinion Filed April 7, 2020
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00329-CV
IN RE OMAR H. HENRY, Relator
On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 416-56857-2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Evans
Opinion by Justice Evans
In this original proceeding, Omar H. Henry attempted to file a document
styled “Criminal Complaint Notice of Felony” purporting to accuse a Collin County
judge of treason and other crimes. When the Clerk of the Court returned the
document to relator on the ground relator had no appeal pending in this Court, relator
resubmitted the document now accompanied with a second document beginning
with the phrase “Order to Clerk of Court to Perform Specific Ministerial Acts”
describing his filing as “pleadings for writ of habeas corpus” and alleging the Clerk
of the Court is obliged to file relator’s document.
“The purpose of a writ of habeas corpus is to obtain a speedy and effective
adjudication of a person’s right to liberation from illegal restraint.” Ex parte Kerr,
64 S.W.3d 414, 419 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); see also Ex parte Gordon, 584 S.W.2d
686, 687–88 (Tex. 1972) (original proceeding). Nowhere in any of his pleadings
does relator articulate a basis for habeas relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (Court
must deny petition if it concludes relator not entitled to relief).
/David Evans/
DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
200329F.P05
–2–