in Re Jules Dylan Stuer ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • DENY and Opinion Filed February 13, 2020
    S    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-20-00177-CV
    IN RE JULES DYLAN STUER, Relator
    Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-05507
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek
    Opinion by Justice Reichek
    Before the Court is relator’s February 10, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus. Entitlement
    to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its
    discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 
    148 S.W.3d 124
    , 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, and noting relator has
    failed to provide us with any mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled
    to the relief requested.
    1
    Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief
    sought).
    /Amanda L. Reichek/
    AMANDA L. REICHEK
    JUSTICE
    200177F.P05
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-20-00177-CV

Filed Date: 2/13/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/17/2020