in Re Fraudulent Hospital Lien Litigation ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                  NUMBER 13-19-00638-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI–EDINBURG
    IN RE FRAUDULENT HOSPITAL LIEN LITIGATION
    On appeal from MDL No. 15-0360-H in the 444th District Court
    of Cameron County, Texas.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Tijerina
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
    MedData d/b/a Alegis Revenue Group, L.L.C. (MedData) filed this notice of appeal
    from MDL No. 15-0360-H, In re Fraudulent Hospital Lien Litigation, pending in the 444th
    District Court of Cameron County, Texas.1 MedData alleged that the judge of the MDL
    pretrial court had not ruled on MedData’s motion to dismiss filed pursuant to the Texas
    1
    This case originated in trial court cause number C-2481-19-D in the 206th District Court of Hidalgo
    County, Texas, which was transferred to MDL No. 15-0360-H in the 444th District Court of Cameron County,
    Texas, for consolidated pretrial proceedings.
    Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) within the statutory deadline, and accordingly, its motion
    to dismiss was “considered to have been denied by operation of law.” See TEX. CIV. PRAC.
    & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 27.005(a), 27.008(a). This appeal ensued.
    On January 9, 2020, MedData filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Premature.”
    Without “abandoning its position that each case in an MDL proceeding is distinct,”
    MedData asserted that its attempted interlocutory appeal should be dismissed on grounds
    that the underlying MDL proceedings are stayed, and thus its notice of appeal was
    premature. MedData’s motion to dismiss is opposed by appellees, Mayra Alaniz, et al.,2
    however, more than ten days have passed since the motion to dismiss was filed and
    appellees have not filed a response or other pleading in opposition to MedData’s motion.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.1(b), 10.3(a).
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss and the
    applicable law, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons
    expressed in our opinion in In re Fraudulent Hospital Lien Litigation, No. 13-19-00627-
    CV, 2020 WL _____ (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Mar. 5, 2020, no pet. h.) (mem.
    op.),       available   at   http://www.search.txcourts.gov/case.aspx?cn=13-19-00627-CV.
    2
    The appellees include: Mayra Alaniz, Marla Cantu, Mayra Castillo, Rigoberto Castillo, Victor
    Castillo, Marina Chavez, Anthony Contreras, Juan Deanda, Baldomero Delasancha, Celia Gonzalez, Maria
    Gonzalez, Mirtha Gonzalez, Vannesa Gonzalez, Fred Gorena, Ruben Guerra, Juana Guevara, Laura
    Gutierrez, Benilde Ibarra, Nereida Jaramillo, Dora Linan, Leticia Lopez, Daisy Martinez, David Martinez,
    Juan Martinez Jr., Maria Martinez, Olivia Martinez, Margaret Menchaca, Jorge L. Mendoza, Sergio
    Mendoza, Linda Nnajiofor, Wilson Nunez, Evelyn Olvera, Isaac Prestamo, Victor Ramirez, Jesus Ramos,
    Diana Reyna, Roxanne Reyna, Nora Rivera, Fernando Robles, Ernestina Roel, Yolanda Rojas, Maria
    Salas, Baldemar Salazar, Sergio Saldivar, Thalia Sanchez-Ramirez, Erika Torres, Eufemia Torres, Juan
    Veloz, Virgilio Zapata, and Maria Alicia Zavala.
    2
    Accordingly, we grant MedData’s motion to dismiss and we dismiss this appeal for lack
    of jurisdiction. Pending motions, if any, are dismissed as moot.
    GINA M. BENAVIDES,
    Justice
    Delivered and filed the
    5th day of March, 2020.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-19-00638-CV

Filed Date: 3/5/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/7/2020