in the Interest of E. S. L., a Child ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed March 5, 2020
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-20-00036-CV
    __________
    IN THE INTEREST OF E.S.L., A CHILD
    On Appeal from the 446th District Court
    Ector County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. E-17-091-PC
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On February 4, 2020, counsel for E.S.L.’s father filed a notice of appeal relating
    to the order of termination of parental rights that was signed by the trial court on
    October 22, 2019. When the appeal was docketed in this court, the clerk of this court
    notified the parties that it appeared to this court that the notice of appeal was not timely
    filed, and we requested that Appellant respond and show grounds to continue the
    appeal. Appellant has not responded to this court’s letter.
    The documents on file in this appeal show that, on October 22, 2019, the trial
    court signed an order of termination that was a final, appealable order. The notice of
    appeal was therefore due to be filed on November 12, 2019.                   See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 26.1(b), 28.1(b) (providing that, in an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal,
    must be filed within twenty days after the date the order was signed); see also TEX. R.
    APP. P. 4.1(a) (applying when last day of filing deadline falls on a weekend or
    holiday). Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until February 4, 2020—well after
    the deadline and also after the time in which this court would be authorized to grant a
    fifteen-day extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. We are prohibited from suspending
    the Rules of Appellate Procedure “to alter the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil
    case.” TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court is without
    jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 
    160 S.W.3d 559
    , 564 (Tex. 2005); Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank, 
    227 S.W.3d 233
    , 233–
    34 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). Because we are without jurisdiction, we must dismiss
    the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    March 5, 2020
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1
    Willson, J., not participating.
    1
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-20-00036-CV

Filed Date: 3/5/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/7/2020