in the Interest of I. L. and A. E., Minor Children ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                    COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    IN THE INTEREST OF I. L. AND A. E.,             §               No. 08-20-00016-CV
    MINOR CHILDREN,
    §                  Appeal from the
    Appellant,
    §                 65th District Court
    .                                               §             of El Paso County, Texas
    §               (TC# 2018DCM2305)
    §
    ORDER
    Counsel for Appellant E.L. has moved to withdraw from representing Appellant on
    appeal. The motion is GRANTED.
    We further note that although Appellant was entitled to appointed counsel in the trial
    court, Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel on appeal.
    The Texas Family Code provides for appointed counsel for an indigent parent in child
    protection cases brought by the government “in which termination of the parent-child
    relationship or the appointment of a conservator for a child is requested[.]” TEX.FAM.CODE ANN.
    § 107.013(a)(1). Here, there is no request from the Department for termination or appointment
    of a conservator at issue on appeal, nor is there a judgment terminating Appellant’s parental
    rights or naming the Department as a child’s managing conservator. Instead, the trial court
    issued an order dismissing the Department’s case because Mother had complied with the service
    plan. After ruling on that portion of the case, the trial court then ruled separately on a purported
    counterclaim Appellant brought against Mother for custody of their daughter and dismissed
    Father’s counterclaim.
    Because the dispute is now essentially a private dispute between Appellant and Mother
    over custody of their child following dismissal of the Department’s action, Appellant is not
    entitled to appointed counsel. Cf. In re J.C., 
    250 S.W.3d 486
    , 487-88 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth
    2008, pet. denied), cert. denied sub nom Rhine v. Deaton, 
    559 U.S. 903
    (2010)(parent not
    1
    entitled to statutory appointed counsel when the Department is non-suited and the only
    remaining termination claim is brought by a private party).
    Further, Appellant’s brief is due with this Court on or before April 13, 2020.
    IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2020.
    PER CURIAM
    Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-20-00016-CV

Filed Date: 3/6/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021