Nina Marie Dukes v. State ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-20-00051-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    NINA MARIE DUKES,                                                           Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 117th District Court
    of Nueces County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
    Appellant, Nina Marie Dukes, attempted to appeal an order modifying conditions
    of probation issued by the trial court on October 24, 2019. On January 27, 2020, the Clerk
    of this Court notified appellant the order from which the appeal was taken did not appear
    to be an appealable order. The letter requested correction of this defect within ten days
    or the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no corrective action has been taken by
    appellant.
    The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders in a
    criminal appeal absent express statutory authority. Apolinar v. State, 
    820 S.W.2d 792
    ,
    794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Bridle v. State, 
    16 S.W.3d 906
    , 907 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
    2000, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: (1) certain appeals while on
    deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 
    942 S.W.2d 624
    , 625 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce bond, TEX. R. APP. P.
    31.1; 
    McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161
    ; and (3) certain appeals from the denial of habeas
    corpus relief, Wright v. State, 
    969 S.W.2d 588
    , 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.);
    
    McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161
    . See also 
    Bridle, 16 S.W.3d at 908
    n.1.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal and the
    matters before the Court, is of the opinion there is not an appealable order and this Court
    lacks jurisdiction over the matters here. Because there is no appealable order, we
    DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. All pending motions, if any, are likewise
    DISMISSED.
    NORA L. LONGORIA
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the
    19th day of March, 2020.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-20-00051-CR

Filed Date: 3/19/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/21/2020