Eddie Estep v. State ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                             COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    EDDIE ESTEP,                                   No. 08-19-00280-CR
    §
    Appellant,                        Appeal from the
    §
    v.                                              205th District Court
    §
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                          of El Paso County, Texas
    §
    State.                         (TC# 20150D04089)
    §
    ORDER
    Appellant has filed a motion to abate appeal and remand for hearing on lost portion of the
    reporter’s record. We have determined that a hearing is required. In acting on a
    motion/objection of this type, this Court typically abates appellate proceedings and refers the
    matter to the trial court for a hearing so that a record can be made on which the Court can base a
    decision. However, local social distancing orders and other directives related to the ongoing
    COVID-19 situation require this Court to balance its need to continue operations and administer
    justice with the need to ensure litigants, attorneys, judges, staff, and members of the public
    remain safe and comply with all applicable laws, orders, and directives.
    Pursuant to the Joint Third Emergency Order Regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster,
    Misc. Docket No. 20-9044 (Tex. Mar. 19, 2020), non-essential proceedings may not be held in-
    person contrary to local shelter-in-place orders through May 8, 2020. However, the Office of
    Court Administration's latest Coronavirus Operation Guidance issued on April 17, 2020,
    suggests that all courts should delay all in-person proceedings of any size until June 1, 2020.
    In light of the Joint Third Emergency Order, the OCA guidelines, and our own
    assessment of the current risk presented to all parties and entities, we will abate proceedings in
    this Court and refer this matter for a videoconference hearing (NOT an in-person hearing) in
    the trial court. The following procedure is established:
    1
    •   The trial court is directed to hold a videoconference hearing on this matter, if feasible, by
    May 17, 2020. The court reporter is directed to forward a copy of the transcript of this
    hearing to this Court by Mary 27, 2020.
    •   If it is not feasible for the trial court to hold a videoconferencing hearing on this matter
    by May 17, 2020, the trial court is directed to file a statement with this Court explaining
    the circumstances preventing the videoconference hearing from occurring. Prompt
    communication with the Court regarding logistical issues via eFile and email will be
    greatly appreciated.
    -   The trial court’s statement may also include requests for reasonable accommodations,
    including but not limited to requests for an alternate hearing deadline, requests to
    excuse informalities in the record, requests to send original recordings of video
    proceedings in lieu of a reporter’s record in the event a court reporter is unavailable,
    etc. This Court will entertain reasonable accommodation requests and will work with
    the trial court in resolving logistical issues.
    IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2020.
    PER CURIAM
    Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-19-00280-CR

Filed Date: 4/22/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/27/2020