in the Interest of J. R. M., a Child ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                              NUMBER 13-20-00174-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    IN THE INTEREST OF J.R.M., A CHILD
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 347th District Court
    of Nueces County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
    Appellant Jose Luis Montes Jr., proceeding pro se, attempts to appeal from the
    trial court's “Order in Suit for Modification of Support Order and to Confirm Support
    Arrearage” which was signed on August 1, 2019. Appellant filed a notice of restricted
    appeal on March 27, 2020.
    Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the final judgment is
    signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended to
    ninety days after the date the judgment is signed if, within thirty days after the judgment
    is signed, any party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment,
    motion to reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and
    conclusions of law. See
    id. R. 26.1(a);
    TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a), (g). The time to file a notice
    of appeal may also be extended if, within fifteen days after the deadline to file the notice
    of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.
    To qualify for a restricted appeal, an appellant must establish that: (1) he filed the
    notice of restricted appeal within six months after the judgment or order appealed from
    was signed; (2) he was a party to the underlying suit; (3) he did not timely file a post-
    judgment motion or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, or notice of appeal;
    (4) he did not participate, either in person or through counsel, in the hearing that resulted
    in the judgment complained of; and (5) the trial court erred and the error is apparent from
    the face of the record. See
    id. R. 26.1(c),
    30; Eguia v. Eguia, 
    367 S.W.3d 455
    , 458 (Tex.
    App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2012, no pet.). Here, appellant’s notice of restricted
    appeal was filed on March 27, 2020, fifty-five days past the restricted-appeal deadline of
    February 3, 2020, the Monday following the expiration of sixth months from the August 1,
    2020 order. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(c), 30. Appellant has failed to comply with
    the first requirement for a restricted appeal because he did not timely file a notice of
    restricted appeal within six months of the challenged order. Without a timely filed notice
    of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1, 26.1(c).
    On April 7, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the
    appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be
    dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the
    2
    Court’s directive. See
    id. R. 42.3(a),
    (c). Appellant filed a “Motion to Proceed with Out of
    Time Restricted Appeal” on April 21, 2020.
    It is “well settled” that “appellate jurisdiction cannot be created by consent,
    stipulation of the parties, or waiver, either by the court or by the litigants.” Welder v. Fritz,
    
    750 S.W.2d 930
    , 932 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 1988, no writ); see Stine v.
    State, 
    908 S.W.2d 429
    (Tex. 1995) (“It is . . . fundamental that the parties of a suit can
    neither confer nor waive jurisdiction by agreement or consent.”). An appellate court does
    not have the authority “to alter the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case.” TEX. R.
    APP. P. 2. Therefore, appellant’s motion to extend the appellate deadlines is DENIED.
    Appellant’s notice of appeal does not demonstrate this Court’s jurisdiction over his
    untimely restricted appeal. See
    id. R. 26.1(c).
    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for
    want of jurisdiction. See
    id. R. 42.3(a);
    43.2(f).
    LETICIA HINOJOSA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed the
    30th day of April, 2020.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-20-00174-CV

Filed Date: 4/30/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/2/2020