Ex Parte: Slade Alan Moore ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    No. 08-20-00066-CR
    §
    Appeal from the
    EX PARTE:                                         §
    County Court
    SLADE ALAN MOORE                                  §
    of Andrews County, Texas
    §
    (TC# 19-0258)
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING
    The opinion and judgment issued on April 9, 2020 are hereby withdrawn. The following is
    the opinion of this Court.
    Slade Alan Moore has moved for reconsideration of this Court's decision to dismiss this
    appeal for want of jurisdiction. We will grant the motion and reinstate the appeal.
    The Court initially dismissed this case because it appeared Appellant was attempting to
    appeal from an order denying a motion to quash an indictment, which is not an appealable
    interlocutory order. See Webb v. State, Nos. 10-12-00365-CR, 10-12-00366-CR, 
    2012 WL 5697585
    , at *1 (Tex.App.—Waco Nov. 15, 2012, no pet.). However, on rehearing, Appellant
    clarified that he sought to appeal the denial of his pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus
    challenging the constitutionality of a statute. The denial of a pretrial habeas corpus writ application
    is a final appealable order. See Ex parte Hinojos, No. 08-17-00077-CR, 
    2018 WL 6629678
    , at *1
    (Tex.App.—El Paso Dec. 19, 2018, pet. ref’d)(not designated for publication)(noting that pretrial
    habeas corpus proceedings are separate criminal actions allowing the applicant the right to an
    immediate appeal before trial begins); see also Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth
    Dist., 
    159 S.W.3d 645
    , 650 (Tex. 2005)(claims raised in a pretrial habeas application may be
    immediately reviewed in a direct pretrial appeal, even where the same claims could not be
    reviewed pretrial absent explicit statutory authorization if those claims had been raised simply by
    pretrial motion).
    Therefore, we grant Appellant’s motion to reconsider and reinstate this appeal. We hereby
    order the appellate timelines in this case to be reestablished. The reporter’s record is due thirty
    days from the date of this opinion.
    April 30, 2020
    YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
    Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
    (Do Not Publish)
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-20-00066-CR

Filed Date: 4/30/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/4/2020