John Dee Spicer, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Misty Chaney Brady John Dee Spicer, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of BP Chaney John Dee Spicer, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Texas RHH, LLC And Zera Inc. v. Maxus Healthcare Partners, LLC ( 2020 )

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
No. 02-17-00449-CV
JOHN DEE SPICER, CHAPTER 7 § On Appeal from the 17th District
TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY Court
ESTATE OF MISTY CHANEY BRADY;
JOHN DEE SPICER, CHAPTER 7 §
TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY of Tarrant County (017-275219-14)
ESTATE OF BP CHANEY; JOHN DEE
SPICER, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE §
BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF TEXAS RHH,
LLC; AND ZERA INC., Appellant October 1, 2020
§
V.
§
MAXUS HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, LLC Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice
Sudderth
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was error in the trial court’s judgment. We remand the case to the trial court and
make the following modifications to the trial court’s judgment:
• Having sustained part of Appellants’ first and second issues, we
o delete the award of $31,000 to Maxus under APA Section 2.16;
o delete the award of $250,000 to Maxus under APA Section 4.15;
o delete the specific performance requirement as to Zera’s Kinnser software
system; and
o remand for the trial court to reconsider the $100,000 awarded to Maxus
under APA Section 2.16.
• Having sustained Appellants’ third issue, we delete the $115,112.83 awarded to
Maxus for breach by Zera and the $250,000 awarded to Maxus against Zera for
promissory estoppel.
• Pursuant to Appellants’ fourth issue, we reform the harmful-access-of-computer
award to reflect $9,000.
• Having sustained part of Appellants’ sixth issue, we
o delete the award of $1,237,655.87 in attorney’s fees against Texas RHH,
o delete the award of $53,006.09 in attorney’s fees against Zera;
o delete the award of $15,901.83 in attorney’s fees against Brady; and
o delete the award of $15,901.83 in attorney’s fees against BP Chaney.
• Having sustained part of Appellants’ fifth issue (the remainder of Appellant’s fifth
issue having been rendered moot per the above), we hold that while Texas RHH is
liable for $2.3 million for breach of contract, less the $250,000 settlement credit
and the escrow amount, and that Brady is liable for $2.3 million for fraud, less the
$250,000 settlement credit and the escrow amount, this portion of the case is
remanded to the trial court for Maxus to make an election between its recovery for
breach-of-contract claim and for fraud.
It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for
which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_________________
Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth