Jeremy Ming v. S & M Acquisitions & Development, Inc. ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                         NO. 12-20-00152-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    JEREMY MING,                                              §   APPEAL FROM THE 294TH
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                        §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    S & M ACQUISITIONS &
    DEVELOPMENT, INC.,                                        §   VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS
    APPELLEE
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
    Appellant, Jeremy Ming, perfected this appeal on June 12, 2020. The clerk’s record was filed on
    August 11 and Ming’s brief was due on or before September 10. On September 25, this Court
    notified Ming that the brief was past due. We further notified Ming that the appeal may be
    dismissed for want of prosecution unless a motion for extension of time, containing a reasonable
    explanation for the failure to file a brief and showing that Appellee has not suffered material
    injury thereby, is filed no later than October 5.
    The October 5 deadline has passed and Ming has not filed a brief, a motion for leave to
    file a late brief, or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want
    of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
    Opinion delivered October 14, 2020.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    OCTOBER 14, 2020
    NO. 12-20-00152-CV
    JEREMY MING,
    Appellant
    V.
    S & M ACQUISITIONS & DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 294th District Court
    of Van Zandt County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 20-00104)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
    considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of
    prosecution.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the
    appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be
    certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-20-00152-CV

Filed Date: 10/14/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2020