Gregory Jackson v. Mr. Keneth Eldridge, Branch Manager, Ms. Stephanie Libadia, Human Resources, True Blue/People Ready Corporation Ans Mr. Steve(John Doe) Project Manager ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 19, 2020
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-20-00825-CV
    MR. GREGORY B. JACKSON, Appellant
    V.
    MR. KEN, MESQUITE TEXAS BRANCH MANAGER, TRUE
    BLUE/PEOPLE READY CORPORATION, MS. STEPHANIE LIBADIA,
    HUMAN RESOURCES, MR. STEVE PROJECT MANAGER INDIANA
    INDUSTRIES, Appellees
    On Appeal from the 95th District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-17283
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Nowell
    Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
    Before the Court is appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his notice
    of appeal. Appellant seeks to appeal from the trial court’s July 10, 2020 order
    granting a Rule 91a motion to dismiss.1 See TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a. Appellant did not
    1
    The order dismisses appellant’s claims against Mr. Ken, Mesquite Texas Branch Manager, True
    Blue/People Ready Corporation, and Ms. Stephanie Libadia, Human Resources. The order does not address
    appellant’s claims against Mr. Steve Project Manager Indiana Industries. Because nothing in the record
    reflected those claims had been addressed, we questioned whether the order was final and appealable. See
    Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001) (subject to mostly statutory exceptions, appeal
    may be taken only from final judgment or order that disposes of all parties and claims). In jurisdictional
    briefing, appellant notes Mr. Steve was not served and explains Mr. Steve was no longer “included as a
    file a motion for new trial or to modify the judgment. Accordingly, the notice of
    appeal was due August 10, 2020 or, with an extension motion, August 25, 2020. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1, 26.3. The notice of appeal, however, was not filed until
    September 11, 2020.
    A motion for extension of time is proper only when the notice of appeal is
    filed within the extension period. See
    id. 26.3.
    Because the notice of appeal here
    was filed outside the extension period, we deny the motion without regard to the
    merits and dismiss the appeal and all other pending motions for want of jurisdiction.
    See
    id. 42.3(a);
    Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 
    302 S.W.3d 542
    ,
    545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely filing of a notice of
    appeal is jurisdictional).
    /Robert D. Burns, III/
    ROBERT D. BURNS, III
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    200825F.P05
    defendant” after “his employer could not be located and his last name could not be discovered.” See Sabine
    Offshore Serv., Inc. v. City of Port Arthur, 
    595 S.W.2d 840
    , 841 (Tex. 1979) (per curiam) (noting appellate
    court may consider affidavit outside the record for purposes of determining jurisdiction). Under these
    circumstances, “the case stands as if there had been a discontinuance” as to Mr. Steve, and the order is
    deemed final for purposes of appeal. See Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn, 
    363 S.W.2d 230
    , 232
    (Tex. 1962) (judgment that disposes of some but not all defendants is final for purposes of appeal if only
    remaining defendants have not been served and nothing in record reflects plaintiff ever expected to obtain
    service on unserved defendants).
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    Mr. GREGORY B. JACKSON,                     On Appeal from the 95th District
    Appellant                                   Court, Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-17283.
    No. 05-20-00825-CV         V.               Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
    Burns, Justices Whitehill and Nowell
    Mr. Ken, Mesquite Texas Branch              participating.
    Manager, True Blue/People Ready
    Corporation, Ms. Stephanie Libadia,
    Human Resources, Mr. Steve Project
    Manager Indiana Industries,
    Appellees
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
    Judgment entered October 19, 2020.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-20-00825-CV

Filed Date: 10/19/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/21/2020