Mindy Star Alfaro A.K.A. Mindy Star Lynch v. State ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    October 28, 2020
    No. 04-20-00419-CR
    Mindy Star ALFARO a.k.a. Mindy Star Lynch,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018CR8159
    The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On February 21, 2019, Mindy Star Alfaro a.k.a. Mindy Star Lynch pled nolo contendere
    to possession of a controlled substance and was placed on deferred adjudication community
    supervision for three years. On August 26, 2019, the State filed an amended motion to adjudicate
    Alfaro’s guilt. On July 22, 2020, the trial court revoked Alfaro’s deferred adjudication
    community supervision, found her guilty of possession of controlled substance, and sentenced
    her to six months in prison. The same day, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s
    right to appeal stating Alfaro had “waived the right to appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2)
    (requiring the trial court to enter a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal each time it
    enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order). Thereafter, Alfaro timely filed a notice of
    appeal.
    We are obligated to review the record to determine if a trial court’s certification is
    defective. Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). A certification is
    defective if it proves to be inaccurate when compared with the record.
    Id. at 614.
    Here, nothing
    in the clerk’s record shows that Alfaro waived her right to appeal the revocation proceeding.
    Furthermore, in Hargesheimer v. State, 
    182 S.W.3d 906
    , 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006), the
    Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that even when a defendant originally enters into a plea-
    bargain agreement for deferred adjudication, when the defendant appeals from a revocation
    proceeding, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2 will not restrict her right to appeal.
    Id. “Under this circumstance,
    the trial judge must check the box on the certification form indicating
    that the case ‘is not a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal.’”
    Id. Appellant’s counsel has
    already filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw in this
    appeal. After an appellant’s brief has been filed, the trial court may amend a certification only
    when we grant it leave to do so and under the terms we prescribe. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f).
    Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to complete an amended certification designating this
    case as “not a plea-bargain case” on or before November 9, 2020. We also ORDER the trial
    court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s amended certification
    on or before November 16, 2020.
    _________________________________
    Irene Rios, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 28th day of October, 2020.
    ___________________________________
    Michael A. Cruz,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-20-00419-CR

Filed Date: 10/28/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2020