Eric E. Deleon-Bolado v. Lorraine M. Deleon ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-20-00433-CV
    Eric E. DELEON-BOLADO,
    Appellant
    v.
    Lorraine M. DELEON,
    Appellee
    From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2020-CI-07162
    Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    Irene Rios, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: October 28, 2020
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
    In the case underlying this appeal, the trial court signed an appealable order on July 31,
    2020. No motion for new trial or other timely postjudgment motion that would extend the deadline
    to file a notice of appeal was filed. See, e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). A notice of appeal was due
    on August 31, 2020, and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on
    September 15, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3.
    On September 4, 2020, after the deadline to file a notice of appeal, Appellant filed a notice
    of appeal without filing a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See generally
    04-20-00433-CV
    Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). However, “a motion for extension of time
    is necessarily implied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [notice of appeal] beyond the
    time allowed by Rule [26.1], but within the fifteen-day period in which the appellant would be
    entitled to move to extend the filing deadline under Rule [26.3].”
    Id. On September 23,
    2020, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing not later than
    October 5, 2020, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 10.5(b) (requirements for a motion for extension of time); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a)
    (dismissal for want of jurisdiction); Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 
    774 S.W.2d 668
    , 670 (Tex.
    1989) (reasonable explanation). We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond within the time
    provided, we would dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (dismissal for failure to comply
    with court order).
    To date, Appellant has not filed any response to our September 23, 2020 order.
    Appellant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file a notice of
    appeal; Appellant has not complied with Rule 26.3. Thus, Appellant’s notice of appeal was not
    timely filed, and he has failed to invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction. See 
    Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617
    . We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-20-00433-CV

Filed Date: 10/28/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2020