Ricky Pimienta v. State ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 28, 2020
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-20-00904-CR
    RICKY PIMIENTA, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F19-12515-S
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness
    Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness
    On August 21, 2020, Ricky Pimenta signed a plea bargain agreement with the
    State. Under the terms of the agreement, the State recommended a five-year sentence
    in exchange for appellant pleading guilty to manufacturing more than four grams but
    less than 200 grams of heroin and waiving his right to appeal. The trial court
    followed the agreement, finding appellant guilty, assessing punishment at five years
    in prison, and certifying this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right
    of appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” Appellant filed a
    timely pro se notice of appeal with this Court.
    When an appellant waives his right to appeal as part of his plea bargain
    agreement with the State, a subsequent notice of appeal filed by him fails to “initiate
    the appellate process” and deprives this Court of jurisdiction. Lundgren v. State, 
    434 S.W.3d 594
    , 599, 600 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). If the court of appeals lacks
    jurisdiction, it must dismiss the appeal. See Jones v. State, 
    488 S.W.3d 801
    , 808
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2016).
    The clerk’s record contains appellant’s plea bargain agreement, the trial
    court’s judgment, and the trial court’s certification that appellant waived his right to
    appeal. The plea bargain agreement states “With the Court’s approval, the defendant
    herein states that he/she . . . [w]aives the right to appeal to the Court of Appeals.”
    The plea bargain agreement was signed by appellant, his trial attorney, the State, and
    the trial court.
    Under these circumstances, we have no other alternative than to dismiss this
    appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    /Robbie Partida-Kipness/
    ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS
    JUSTICE
    Do Not Publish
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
    200904F.U05
    –2–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    RICKY PIMIENTA, Appellant                   On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial
    District Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-20-00904-CR         V.               Trial Court Cause No. F19-12515-S.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Partida-
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                Kipness. Justices Schenck and
    Osborne participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
    Judgment entered this 28th day of October, 2020.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-20-00904-CR

Filed Date: 10/28/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2020