Tony Ray Mitchell v. Natalie Nicole Mitchell ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed May 27, 2011
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-10-00188-CV
    __________
    TONY RAY MITCHELL
    V.
    NATALIE NICOLE MITCHELL
    On Appeal from the 18th District Court
    Johnson County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. D201005519
    MEMORANDUM                OPINION
    This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed on August 30, 2010. Appellant,
    Tony Ray Mitchell, timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. However, neither a reporter’s record
    nor an appellant’s brief has been filed. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
    The court reporter notified this court that appellant neither filed a written designation
    specifying the matters to be included in the reporter’s record nor made arrangements to pay for
    the reporter’s record. On December 2, 2010, the clerk of this court wrote appellant at his last
    known address and informed him that the case would be submitted on the clerk’s record alone.
    The clerk’s letter further advised appellant that his brief would be due for filing on or before
    January 3, 2011. The clerk’s letter of December 2, 2010, was returned to the clerk’s office by
    the U.S. Postal Service with the notation “RETURN TO SENDER / NOT DELIVERABLE AS
    ADDRESSED / UNABLE TO FORWARD.” The clerk’s office subsequently made repeated
    attempts to call appellant by telephone in order to obtain his current mailing address, but the
    clerk’s office was never able to reach appellant.
    Appellant’s brief is now more than four months overdue. Furthermore, appellant has
    failed to provide this court with his current mailing address so that the court can provide him
    with notices issued by the court as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 6.3(c).                                      Litigants have a
    continuing duty to keep the court and parties apprised of their correct and current address. See
    Ashworth v. Brzoska, 
    274 S.W.3d 324
    , 331-32 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).
    Therefore, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) and 42.3(b), the appeal is dismissed for want of
    prosecution.
    PER CURIAM
    May 27, 2011
    Panel1 consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    McCall, J., and Hill, J.2
    1
    Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011. The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a
    successor by the governor.
    2
    John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-10-00188-CV

Filed Date: 5/27/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021