in Re: E. B. ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-17-00214-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                    §
    E.B.,                                                     §    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR                                                   §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    On July 6, 2017, E.B. filed an original proceeding in which he challenged Respondent’s
    temporary orders based on a Rule 11/Informal Conference Agreement between the parties in a
    divorce proceeding. On October 18, this Court conditionally granted E.B.’s petition and directed
    Respondent to vacate his April 27, 2017 temporary orders regarding child support,
    conservatorship, and possession. M.B. filed a petition for writ of mandamus with the Texas
    Supreme Court and the Supreme Court granted a stay of this Court’s October order. See In re
    M.B., No. 17-0944 (Tex. Nov. 30, 2017) (order). Subsequently, the Texas Supreme Court
    denied M.B.’s petition, without an opinion, and lifted its stay. See In re M.B., No. 17-0944
    (Tex. June 8, 2018) (notice). Accordingly, given the Supreme Court’s ruling, by an order signed
    on July 9, 2018, Respondent complied with this Court’s October 2017 opinion and order,
    rendering this proceeding moot. We dismiss E.B.’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
    Opinion delivered July 18, 2018.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    JULY 18, 2018
    NO. 12-17-00214-CV
    E.B.,
    Relator
    V.
    HON. JASON A. ELLIS,
    Respondent
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus E. B.; who is
    the relator in Cause No. 16-1151-E, pending on the docket of the County Court at Law of Smith
    County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on July 6, 2017, and
    the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should
    not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for
    writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-17-00214-CV

Filed Date: 7/18/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021