Onoyom Godrey Ukpong v. Dawn Deborrah Ukpong ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                   NO. 12-14-00192-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    ONOYOM GODREY UKPONG,                           §      APPEAL FROM THE 366TH
    APPELLANT
    V.                                              §      JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    DAWN DEBORRAH UKPONG,
    APPELLEE                                        §      COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Appellant, Onoyom Godrey Ukpong, filed a notice of appeal from “an order entered by
    the 366[th] Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, on May 21, 2014 denying Appellant’s
    Motion for New Trial.”
    We have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a final judgment or from interlocutory orders
    as expressly authorized by statute. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 51.012, 51.014
    (West Supp. 2014). An order denying a motion for new trial is not a judgment, and is not
    independently appealable. State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan, 
    335 S.W.3d 421
    , 428 (Tex.
    App.–Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014.
    Any appeal is required to be taken from the judgment, not from the denial of the motion for new
    trial. Macklin v. Saia Motor Freight Lines, Inc., No. 06-12-00038-CV, 
    2012 WL 1155141
    , at
    *1 (Tex. App.–Texarkana Apr. 6, 2012, pet. denied).
    In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3, we provided notice to
    Ukpong that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before August 11, 2014, the
    information in the appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court. Ukpong responded
    by calling our attention to the final divorce decree included in the clerk’s record. However, he
    does not attempt to appeal the final divorce decree, and its inclusion in the clerk’s record does
    not give this court jurisdiction of his appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion for
    new trial. See 
    Berdan, 335 S.W.3d at 428
    . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Opinion delivered August 13, 2014.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    2
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    AUGUST 13, 2014
    NO. 12-14-00192-CV
    ONOYOM GODREY UKPONG,
    Appellant
    V.
    DAWN DEBORRAH UKPONG,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 366th District Court
    of Collin County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 366-52121-2013)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
    being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the
    appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision
    be certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-14-00192-CV

Filed Date: 8/13/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021