Jesse Garrett Weitenbeck v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-18-00470-CR
    Jesse Garrett WEITENBECK,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2016CR7674
    Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:           Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: August 22, 2018
    DISMISSED
    The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain
    case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain,
    and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and
    agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the
    underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
    Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be
    dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part
    04-18-00470-CR
    of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On July 16, 2018, we ordered that this
    appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification
    showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by August
    13, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 
    110 S.W.3d 174
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
    On August 9, 2018, appellant’s attorney filed a response requesting that this court retain
    the appeal on its docket; however, the response also states the trial court denied appellant’s motion
    to amend the trial court’s certification. In the absence of an amended trial court certification
    showing that the appellant has the right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this
    appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-18-00470-CR

Filed Date: 8/22/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2018