In the Interest of L.R.L., a Child v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-22-00859-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF L.R.L., a Child
    From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 21-04-00043-CVL
    Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Beth Watkins, Justice
    Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: April 19, 2023
    AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED
    Appellant M.S. appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her child,
    L.R.L. Her court-appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a
    professional evaluation of the record, concluding there are no arguable grounds for reversal of the
    termination order. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). See In re P.M., 
    520 S.W.3d 24
    , 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing that Anders
    procedures apply in parental termination cases). Additionally, counsel represents that she provided
    M.S. with a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw, advised M.S. of her right to review the
    record and file her own brief, and informed M.S. how to obtain a copy of the record, providing her
    with a form motion for access to the appellate record. We issued an order setting a deadline for
    M.S. to file a pro se brief. However, M.S. did not request the appellate record or file a pro se brief.
    04-22-00859-CV
    After reviewing the appellate record and appointed counsel’s brief, we conclude no
    plausible grounds exist for reversal of the termination order. Accordingly, we affirm the trial
    court’s termination order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because it does not show good
    cause for withdrawal. See 
    id.
     at 27 & n.7 (holding that counsel’s obligations in a parental
    termination case extend through exhaustion or waiver of all appeals and that withdrawal should be
    permitted by a court of appeals “only for good cause” (citing TEX. R. CIV. P. 10)).
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-22-00859-CV

Filed Date: 4/19/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/25/2023