Roger Martin, Individually and as Successor Trustee of the Martin Family Trust v. Dale Martin ( 2018 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00279-CV
ROGER MARTIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE
MARTIN FAMILY TRUST,
Appellant
v.
DALE MARTIN,
Appellee
From the 87th District Court
Freestone County, Texas
Trial Court No. 11-136-A
REFERRAL TO MEDIATION ORDER
Appellant indicated in his docketing statement that this appeal should be referred to
mediation.
The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-
154.073 (West 2011). The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of
this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement
of pending litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.” Id. § 154.002 (West
2011). Mediation is a form of ADR. Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement
conference, conducted with the assistance of a mediator. Mediation is private,
confidential, and privileged.
We find that this appeal is appropriate for mediation. See id. § 154.021(a) (West
2011); 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 9.
The parties are ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator. Within
fourteen days after the date of this Order, Appellant is ordered to file a notice with the
Clerk of this Court which either identifies the agreed-upon mediator or states that the
parties are unable to agree upon a mediator. If the notice states that the parties are unable
to agree upon a mediator, this Court will assign a mediator.
Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date the above-referenced notice
agreeing to a mediator is filed or, if no mediator is agreed upon, within thirty days after
the date of the order assigning a mediator.
No less than seven calendar days before the first scheduled mediation session,
each party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet
setting forth the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before
the first session, all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to
Martin v. Martin Page 2
understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement the
information required by this Order.
Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process, and each
party that is not a natural person must be represented by an employee, officer, agent, or
representative with authority to bind the party to settlement.
Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing, only
that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by each party.
The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs. Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without
fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and the parties must
each pay one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.
Failure or refusal to attend the entire mediation as scheduled may result in the
imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law.
Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all
parties within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.
We refer this appeal to mediation.
The appeal and all appellate deadlines are suspended as of the date of this Order.
The suspension of the appeal is automatically lifted when the mediator’s report to the
Court is received. If the matter is not resolved at mediation, any deadline that began to
run and had not expired by the date of this Order will begin anew as of the date the
mediator’s report to the Court is received. Any document filed by a party after the date
Martin v. Martin Page 3
of this Order and prior to the filing of the mediator’s report will be deemed filed on the
same day, but after, the mediator’s report is received.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Order issued and filed August 29, 2018
Mart. v. Martin Page 4