In Re Deandre Dynell Deboest v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )

Opinion issued April 25, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-23-00279-CR
———————————
IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, DeAndre DeBoest, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a
petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court issue a writ of mandamus
directing the trial court to “[s]et [a]sid[e] the [i]ndictment for failure to [c]ompel a
[s]peedy [t]rial.”1
1
The underlying case is DeAndre DeBoest v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 1792110,
in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill
presiding.
Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that he has failed to
establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7,
52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly,
we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2