Adeniran Olawumi v. Clement Ugorji ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 18, 2023
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-23-00150-CV
    ADENIRAN OLAWUMI, Appellant
    V.
    CLEMENT UGORJI, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1183101
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed October 25, 2022.
    Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial on November 15, 2022. Appellant’s
    notice of appeal was filed February 28, 2023. When appellant has filed a timely
    post-judgment motion, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the
    date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).
    Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is
    necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal
    beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
    the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
    See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617–18 (1997) (construing the
    predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the
    15-day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.
    On April 18, 2023, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was
    subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant responded that he is appealing the order denying his
    motion for new trial signed January 30, 2023. An order denying a motion for
    reconsideration or motion for new trial is not independently appealable. See Digges
    v. Knowledge Alliance, Inc., 
    176 S.W.3d 463
    , 464 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
    2004, no pet.). The final appealable judgment in this case is the trial court’s
    October 25, 2022 judgment. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within 90
    days of the judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). We lack jurisdiction to consider
    this appeal. See Ridge v. Ridge, 
    658 S.W.3d 427
    , 431 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th
    Dist.] 2022, no pet.) (“The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional for this
    court, and a late-filed notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction.”).
    Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Spain.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-23-00150-CV

Filed Date: 5/18/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/28/2023