In Re: The Commitment of Terry Hornbuckle v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                  In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-23-00070-CV
    ___________________________
    IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF TERRY HORNBUCKLE
    On Appeal from the 372nd District Court
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court No. D372-S-14054-18
    Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.
    Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On March 6, 2023, we received a document entitled “Notice of Appeal
    Pursuant to Provisions of §[ ]841.146, Texas Health [and Safety] Code.” That same
    day, we sent the parties a letter informing them that we had received a copy of the
    notice of appeal in this case but that it appeared that the notice of appeal was
    premature because the trial court judge had not signed an order. See Tex. R. App. P.
    26.1(a), 27.1. We gave the parties reasonable time to correct the defect in the record,
    see Tex. R. App. P. 44.3, 44.4(a)(2), but did not receive a signed order.
    We sent the parties a second letter on May 12, 2023, informing them that upon
    review of the record, it appeared that the trial court judge had sent the parties an
    emailed letter ruling on “Respondent’s Unauthorized Petition for Release” and had
    asked the State’s attorney to prepare an order for the judge to sign. We further stated
    that this order is not contained in the clerk’s record, however, and that the trial court
    clerk had informed this court that no order was ever signed. We permitted the parties
    another opportunity to correct the defect in the record, giving them until June 1,
    2023, to furnish this court a signed copy of the order that Appellant seeks to appeal.
    See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3, 44.4(a)(2). We stated that if no order was signed and
    furnished by that date, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See
    Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
    The deadline has passed, and we have not a received a signed copy of a final
    judgment or appealable order. We thus dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    2
    See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); see Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195
    (Tex. 2001) (explaining that an appellate court has jurisdiction over appeals from final
    judgments and from certain interlocutory orders made appealable by statute).
    Per Curiam
    Delivered: June 29, 2023
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-23-00070-CV

Filed Date: 6/29/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/3/2023