-
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-23-00006-CV BRITNEY JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE VIEW AT LAKESIDE LP, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-03855-JP Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Britney Johnson, filed a timely pro se notice of appeal on December 12, 2022.1 The clerk’s record was filed on January 12, 2023. The reporter’s record was filed on February 28, 2023. The original deadline for Johnson’s appellate brief was March 30, 2023. When Johnson failed to meet the original deadline for filing her brief, we advised her that her brief was late and extended the briefing deadline until May 1, 2023. On May 1, 2023, we received a document that purported to be Johnson’s appellate brief. On that same date, we sent Johnson a letter explaining that, for numerous reasons, the document we received was inadequate to serve as a brief because it did not meet the requirements of Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. In our letter, we provided Johnson with a detailed explanation of why the document she provided to this Court failed to comply with Rule 38.1. We informed Johnson that, if she did not file a brief that complied with Rule 38.1 by May 23, 2023, this Court could dismiss the appeal. Johnson did not file a brief meeting the requirements of Rule 38.1 and did not file a motion for further extension of time in which to file such a brief. As a result, Johnson’s appeal is ripe for dismissal.2 Pursuant to Rules 38.8 and 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8, 42.3; see also Running v. City of 1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to Section 73.001 of the Texas Government Code. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Second Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 2 Having provided Johnson with ample opportunity to file a proper brief in this matter, we are disinclined to provide her with further direction on how to file a brief that complies with Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Moreover, we do not have the opposing party’s brief and, therefore, cannot affirm on that brief without examining the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(3). 2 Athens, No. 12-18-00047-CV,
2018 WL 2326775, at *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler, May 23, 2018, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Charles van Cleef Justice Date Submitted: June 5, 2023 Date Decided: June 6, 2023 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 06-23-00006-CV
Filed Date: 6/6/2023
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/7/2023