Deneeko Travon Shavers v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )

In the
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-23-00100-CR
DENEEKO TRAVON SHAVERS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 102nd District Court
Bowie County, Texas
Trial Court No. 22F1020-102
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Deneeko Travon Shavers pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance in an amount
greater than four grams but less than two hundred grams.1 Pursuant to a plea bargain with the
State, Shavers was sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment.2 The trial court certified that this
was a plea-bargain case and that Shavers had no right of appeal; nonetheless, Shavers, acting pro
se, filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that we are without jurisdiction over this case due
to the plea bargain between Shavers and the State, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.3
The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases.
Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:
(2) . . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s
plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the
punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a
defendant may appeal only:
(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on
before trial,
(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or
(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court that Shavers
either (1) filed a motion that was ruled on before trial or (2) obtained the trial court’s permission
1
TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(d) (Supp.).
2
Shavers’s punishment range was enhanced to that of a first-degree felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §12.42(b).
3
In conjunction with the plea agreement, Shavers waived his right of appeal. In addition, Shavers’s notice of appeal
was untimely.
2
to appeal. To the contrary, the trial court’s certification of Shavers’s right of appeal indicates
that he has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s
certification indicates no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
We informed Shavers of this apparent defect in our jurisdiction over his appeal and
afforded him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Although Shavers
responded to our letter, his response failed to convince this Court that it has jurisdiction over this
attempted appeal.
Because Shavers has no right of appeal due to his plea bargain with the State and because
the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we dismiss
this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jeff Rambin
Justice
Date Submitted: May 31, 2023
Date Decided: June 1, 2023
Do Not Publish
3