In the Interest of O.C., a Child v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                        In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    No. 07-23-00136-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF O.C., A CHILD
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
    Lubbock County, Texas
    Trial Court No. DC-2022-FM-1204, Honorable Kara L. Darnell, Presiding
    June 5, 2023
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
    Appellant, Mother, appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental
    rights to her child, O.C.1 Because the trial court has granted Mother’s motion for new
    trial, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    We have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a final judgment or from an
    interlocutory order made immediately appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con
    Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001); Stary v. DeBord, 
    967 S.W.2d 352
    , 352–53 (Tex.
    1998) (per curiam). When a trial court grants a motion for new trial, the court’s original
    1 To protect the privacy of the parties involved, we will refer to Appellant as “Mother” and to the
    child by his initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b).
    judgment or order is vacated and the case proceeds as if there had been no trial.
    Markowitz v. Markowitz, 
    118 S.W.3d 82
    , 88 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet.
    denied) (op. on reh’g). Thus, an order granting a new trial deprives an appellate court of
    jurisdiction over an appeal. In re K.F., No. 07-08-00102-CV, 
    2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 2068
    ,
    at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Mar. 19, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Boris v. Boris, 
    642 S.W.2d 855
    , 856 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1982, no writ) (per curiam)).
    The trial court signed the Final Order of Termination of Parental Rights on March
    24, 2023. Thereafter, Mother timely filed a motion for new trial. Within its plenary power,
    the trial court signed an Order Granting Respondent Mother’s Motion for New Trial and
    Setting Hearing. Thus, by letter of May 11, 2023, we notified Mother that it did not appear
    we had jurisdiction over the appeal. We directed her to show grounds for continuing the
    appeal by May 22, or we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Mother has
    not responded to our letter to date.
    Because there is no final judgment or appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for
    want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    Per Curiam
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-23-00136-CV

Filed Date: 6/5/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/8/2023