Jesse Allen Griffin v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                       In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    ________________
    NO. 09-22-00074-CR
    NO. 09-22-00075-CR
    ________________
    JESSE ALLEN GRIFFIN, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    ________________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 128th District Court
    Orange County, Texas
    Trial Cause Nos. A200433-R and A200436-R
    ________________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Jesse Allen Griffin pled guilty to two counts of intoxication manslaughter. See
    
    Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.08
    (b). Under the terms of the plea, Griffin made no
    agreement regarding punishment. After a bench trial regarding punishment only, the
    trial court sentenced Griffin to 14 years’ incarceration for each count, to run
    consecutively.
    1
    In three issues on appeal, Griffin argues that the trial court violated article
    26.13 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the trial court misled him by
    misinforming him of the correct punishment range, and his plea was involuntary.
    The State concedes error as to the first issue. The State agrees that Griffin’s
    conviction and sentence should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
    Per Griffin’s written plea admonishments, Griffin was advised by the trial
    court that since he was pleading guilty to a third-degree felony, he faced a
    punishment range of “[a] term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years in
    TDCJ[.]” The trial court then sentenced Griffin to 14 years’ incarceration. This
    sentence is in violation of Article 26.13(a)(1) of the Texas Code of Criminal
    Procedure that requires a defendant in a “plea of guilty…shall” be admonished of
    “the range of punishment attached to the offense.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.
    art. 26.13.
    We sustain Griffin’s first issue; we reverse and remand the judgments of the
    court for a new trial.
    REVERSED AND REMANDED.
    ________________________________
    JAY WRIGHT
    Justice
    Submitted on May 18, 2023
    Opinion Delivered May 31, 2023
    Do Not Publish
    Before Horton, Johnson, and Wright, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-22-00074-CR

Filed Date: 5/31/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/2/2023