Darius Sauls v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 9, 2023
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-23-00501-CR
    No. 05-23-00502-CR
    No. 05-23-00503-CR
    DARIUS SAULS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F22-00668-M, F21-31855-M, F22-31450-M
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Pedersen, III, Kennedy, and Garcia
    Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
    Appellant appeals the trial court’s failure to lower appellant’s bond pending
    trial.    Appellant states in his combined notice of appeal for these cases,
    “Defendant . . . files this appeal of excessive bail. Bail is excessive set at $100,000
    each solely to keep accuse[d] incarcerated until trial.” The Texas Court of Criminal
    Appeals has held, “There is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the
    courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail
    or the denial of bail.” Ragston v. State, 
    424 S.W.3d 49
    , 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
    The trial court’s online docket sheets for these cases show no appealable
    orders have been entered. See In re Johnson, 
    599 S.W.3d 311
    , 311 (Tex. App.—
    Dallas 2020, no pet.) (taking judicial notice of trial court’s online docket sheet).
    Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals.
    We dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    230501f.u05
    230502f.u05                               /Bill Pedersen, III//
    230503f.u05                               BILL PEDERSEN, III
    Do Not Publish                            JUSTICE
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
    –2–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    DARIUS SAULS, Appellant                        On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial
    District Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-23-00501-CR          V.                 Trial Court Cause No. F22-00668-M.
    Opinion delivered by Justice
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                   Pedersen, III. Justices Kennedy and
    Garcia participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for
    want of jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered this 9th day of June, 2023.
    –3–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    DARIUS SAULS, Appellant                        On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial
    District Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-23-00502-CR          V.                 Trial Court Cause No. F21-31855-M.
    Opinion delivered by Justice
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                   Pedersen, III. Justices Kennedy and
    Garcia participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for
    want of jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered this 9th day of June, 2023.
    –4–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    DARIUS SAULS, Appellant                        On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial
    District Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-23-00503-CR          V.                 Trial Court Cause No. F22-31450-M.
    Opinion delivered by Justice
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                   Pedersen, III. Justices Garcia and
    Kennedy participating.
    Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for
    want of jurisdiction.
    Judgment entered this 9th day of June, 2023.
    –5–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-23-00501-CR

Filed Date: 6/9/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/14/2023