in the Interest of M.A., a Child ( 2019 )

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
November 20, 2019
No. 04-19-00648-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.A., A CHILD,
From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00285
Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding
ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental
rights. After the notice of appeal was filed after the deadline but within the fifteen-day grace
period allowed by Rule 26.3, this court ordered appellant to file a response presenting a
reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner and advising
appellant that if she failed to do so, the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
On October 9, 2019, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion for extension of time to
file the notice of appeal, stating appellant’s late-filing of the notice of appeal was the result of
mistake and inadvertence. We granted appellant’s motion for extension and accepted appellant’s
untimely notice of appeal.
Appellant’s brief was then due November 4, 2019. Appellant did not file a brief or a
motion for extension of time. On November 7, 2019, we notified appellant’s court-appointed
counsel by letter that the brief had not been filed and ordered counsel to file a written response
stating a reasonable explanation for failing to file the brief and demonstrating that counsel was
taking affirmative steps to remedy the deficiency. We warned appellant’s counsel that if she did
not file an adequate response within ten (10) days, we would abate this appeal to the trial court
for an abandonment hearing and potentially initiate contempt proceedings. To date, this court has
not received any response from appellant or appellant’s counsel.
“[I]nvoluntary termination of parental rights involves fundamental constitutional rights.”
Holick v. Smith, 685 S.W.2d 18, 20 (Tex. 1985) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord In re
J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 302 (Tex. 2002). Therefore, we look to the abandonment procedures for
criminal cases for guidance in this circumstance. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); see also TEX. FAM.
CODE ANN. § 107.013 (requiring the trial court to appoint counsel to represent an indigent parent
in a parental termination case); In re K.S.M., 61 S.W.3d 632, 633 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2001, no
pet.) (“Like indigent criminal appellants, indigent appellants challenging an order terminating
their parental rights enjoy a right to counsel on appeal.”).
Therefore, we ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for an
abandonment hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State, 952 S.W.2d 50, 52–53
(Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to
answer the following questions:
(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute the appeal?
(2) Has appointed counsel abandoned the appeal? Because appellant is indigent, the
trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective
assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel.
The trial court, in its discretion, may receive evidence on these questions by sworn
affidavit from appellant. The trial court shall order appellant’s counsel, Ms. Jessica Estorga, to be
present at the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. 38.8(b)(3).
We ORDER the trial court to produce written findings of fact and conclusions of law and
recommendations addressing the questions listed above and deliver them to the trial court clerk
within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order.
We ORDER the trial court clerk and reporter, respectively, to file a supplemental clerk’s
record and a reporter’s record in this court not later than twenty (20) days from the date of this
order, which records shall include the following: (1) a transcript of the hearing and copies of any
documentary evidence admitted, (2) the trial court’s written findings of fact and conclusions of
law, and (3) the trial court’s recommendations addressing the questions listed above. See id.
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
_________________________________
Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 20th day of November, 2019.
___________________________________
MICHAEL A. CRUZ,
Clerk of Court