Larimer v. State ( 2018 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 17-0276
Filed February 7, 2018
ERIC BURDETT LARIMER,
Applicant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA,
Respondent-Appellee.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, Judge.
An applicant appeals the district court’s summary dismissal of his
application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.
R. Ben Stone of Parrish, Kruidenier, Dunn, Boles, Gribble, Gentry, Brown &
Bergmann, L.L.P., Des Moines, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Genevieve Reinkoester, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee State.
Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Potterfield and Mullins, JJ.
2
VOGEL, Presiding Judge.
In 1990, Eric Burdett Larimer pled guilty to possession of a controlled
substance with the intent to deliver, in violation of Iowa Code section
204.401(1)(c)(2)(b) (1989). On May 7, 1990, the district court imposed a sentence
of incarceration not to exceed ten years. On August 3, upon reconsideration, the
court suspended the initial sentence and placed Larimer on probation for two
years. Larimer did not appeal his conviction or sentence. On July 13, 2016,
Larimer filed an application for postconviction relief (PCR). The State filed a
motion to dismiss the PCR application as untimely as provided in Iowa Code
section 822.3 (2016).
At the hearing on the motion to dismiss, Larimer asserted he should be
excused from the three-year statute of limitations pursuant to the doctrine of
equitable tolling because he did not “know anything really about the law,” his
daughter was born shortly after the conviction and suffered from a severe heart
condition, which consumed his time, his house burned down in 1992, and he was
removed from the state into federal custody in Indiana and could not access Iowa
state court files. He claimed that once he studied the law he determined the initial
charge should have been possession, not possession with intent.
The district court rejected Larimer’s claim noting:
The court does not have the authority—equitable or otherwise—to
override the clear directive provided in section 822.3 for filing
applications for postconviction relief, absent proof by the applicant
that the “ground of fact or law” exception applies. Mr. Larimer’s
deadline under section 822.3 for filing his application for
postconviction relief was, at the latest, May 7, 1993. Mr. Larimer
provided no justification recognized by section 822.3 for the long
delay in filing his application.
3
On appeal, Larimer asserts our Iowa appellate courts should recognize the
concept of equitable tolling to override the time limitations found in Iowa Code
section 822.3. He then asserts he should be given another hearing “to establish a
more thorough factual record” in explaining his delay in bringing his PCR
application. Our review is for the correction of errors at law. Castro v. State, 795
N.W.2d 789, 792 (Iowa 2011). We again decline to override the statutory
limitations set forth in Iowa Code section 822.3.1 Because we agree with the
district court’s reasoning in rejecting Larimer’s claim, we affirm the district court’s
summary dismissal of his PCR application without further opinion pursuant to Iowa
Court Rule 21.26(1)(a), (c), (d), and (e).
AFFIRMED.
1
Our court has repeatedly noted the doctrine of equitable tolling does not apply to section
822.3. See James v. State, 858 N.W.2d 32, 33 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014) (noting we have not
applied the equitable tolling doctrine to avoid the three-year time bar found in Iowa Code
section 822.3); see also McCullough v. State, No. 17-0434, 2018 WL 346463, at *1 (Iowa
Ct. App. Jan. 10, 2018) (same); Long v. State, No. 16-1220, 2017 WL 2684345, at *2
(Iowa Ct. App. June 21, 2017) (same); Harrington v. State, No. 16-0953, 2017 WL
2684340, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. June 21, 2017) (same); Perdue v. State, No. 15-1237, 2016
WL 4036173, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. July 27, 2016) (same); Weatherly v. State, No. 15-0681,
2016 WL 1366827, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Apr. 6, 2016) (same); Everett v. State, No. 12-
1032, 2014 WL 3749338, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. July 30, 2014) (same); Majors v. State, No.
12-1090, 2013 WL 2637599, at *5 (Iowa Ct. App. June 12, 2013) (same); Fagan v. State,
No. 10-0739, 2012 WL 3854635, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 6, 2012) (same); Lawrence v.
State, No. 10-1238, 2011 WL 768785, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 7, 2011) (same); Stringer
v. State, No. 08-0188, 2008 WL 5235491, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2008) (same).