Sauls, David Keith ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-90,066-01
    EX PARTE DAVID KEITH SAULS, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 58646-B-1 IN THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM WICHITA COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest
    and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his
    conviction. Sauls v. State, No. 02-17-00224-CR (Tex. App.—Ft. Worth June 28, 2018).
    Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
    failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed or that he could file a pro
    se petition for discretionary review.
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    2
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 
    956 S.W.2d 25
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). In these
    circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
    shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on
    appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s
    appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court
    shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
    appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: July 24, 2019
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-90,066-01

Filed Date: 7/24/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/25/2019