Wolf, Clair A. ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-88,751-01
    EX PARTE CLAIR A. WOLF, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 1354683-A IN THE 248th DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HARRIS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of solicitation of
    capital murder and sentenced to life years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed
    his conviction. Wolf v. State, No. 14-13-00416-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 21, 2014)
    (not designated for publication).
    Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
    in this cause. In order to resolve Applicant’s claims, the trial court entered a detailed and timely
    order designating issues ordering trial counsel, Mr. James Sidney Crowley, to file an affidavit
    2
    answering ten specific questions. However, the trial court failed to obtain an affidavit from trial
    counsel before entering its findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that Applicant’s
    request for habeas corpus relief be denied.
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 
    993 S.W.2d 114
    , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
    circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
    shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
    trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the
    appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. 
    Id. If the
    trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
    performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
    performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
    conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
    habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    3
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: August 22, 2018
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-88,751-01

Filed Date: 8/22/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2018