United States v. Mauricio Espinoza-Jimenez , 697 F. App'x 356 ( 2017 )

Case: 16-51448 Document: 00514150345 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fif h Circuit
No. 16-51448 FILED
Summary Calendar September 11, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MAURICIO ESPINOZA-JIMENEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CR-869-1
Before DAVIS, PRADO, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauricio Espinoza-
Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza-Jimenez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 16-51448 Document: 00514150345 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2017
No. 16-51448
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez,
825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2, and in part as moot based on Espinoza-Jimenez’s completion of his
term of imprisonment, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340-
42 (5th Cir. 2016).
2