Click, Marcus Edward ( 2016 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-86,022-01
EX PARTE MARCUS EDWARD CLICK, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. W12270-1 IN THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HOOD COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of intoxication
manslaughter and, after his initial term of community supervision was revoked, was sentenced to ten
years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Click v. State, No. 02-
14-00247-CR (Tex. App.—Ft. Worth Feb. 27, 2015).
Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not fully
investigating and presenting the defense that Applicant was not driving at the time of the incident.
Applicant alleges that counsel had a witness statement and photos from the scene which tended to
2
show that Applicant was not driving, but he did not share that information with Applicant who could
not remember the details of the incident. He also alleges that counsel did not present the defense that
the offense occurred within a private subdivision which was not open to the general public and
therefore the offense did not occur “in a public place” as required by TEXAS PENAL CODE Sec. 49.08.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall
determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the photos
and witness statement in question were exculpatory, whether counsel discussed that evidence with
Applicant, and whether the defenses Applicant outlines in his application were discussed with
Applicant before his initial guilty plea. The trial court shall also make findings regarding whether
the performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
3
habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 7, 2016
Do not publish