in the Interest of S.M.B., a Child ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                    COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    No. 08-15-00251-CV
    §
    IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.B.,                                          Appeal from
    §
    A CHILD.                                                        380th District Court
    §
    of Collin County, Texas
    §
    (TC # 380-51444-2008)
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should
    be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Finding that the trial court’s interlocutory orders denying a
    motion to transfer venue and to disqualify counsel are not appealable, we dismiss the appeal for
    lack of jurisdiction.
    It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and
    interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corporation, 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001); TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West 2015)(authorizing
    appeals from certain interlocutory orders). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending
    parties and claims.     See 
    Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195
    .        Appellant filed a notice of appeal
    indicating that he is appealing the trial court’s orders denying Appellant’s motion to transfer
    venue under Section 155.021 of the Texas Family Code and denying Appellant’s motion to
    disqualify counsel. The Court notified Appellants that it intended to dismiss the appeal for lack
    of jurisdiction because there is no final judgment and these interlocutory orders are not
    appealable. In his response, Appellant focuses on whether the orders have been reduced to
    writing by the trial court but that is not the critical issue. The issue is whether these interlocutory
    orders are appealable. The Family Code expressly provides that an order denying transfer under
    Section 155.201 is not subject to interlocutory appeal. TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. 155.204(h)(West
    2014). An order denying a motion to disqualify counsel in a civil proceeding is an interlocutory
    order and is subject to review only in an appeal from the final judgment. See National Western
    Life Insurance Company v. Walters, 
    663 S.W.2d 125
    , 126 (Tex.App.--Austin 1983, no writ). We
    therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    November 3, 2015
    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-15-00251-CV

Filed Date: 11/3/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016