Hannah, Casey Joe ( 2008 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

---

NO. WR-69,445-02

---

EX PARTE CASEY JOE HANNAH, Applicant

---

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. A05-312 IN THE 216^TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM KERR COUNTY

---

   Per curiam. O R D E R  

   Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to engaging in organized criminal activity, and was sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to investigate, interview witnesses, obtain discovery of the State's evidence, or explain to Applicant that a conviction could not be had solely on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Applicant alleges that he would not have pleaded guilty had he been aware that State had no independent evidence to corroborate the statements of accomplice witnesses, and that such evidence was necessary to support a conviction.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the State had evidence other than the statements of accomplices to support Applicant's conviction for engaging in organized criminal activity, and if so, what that evidence was. The trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel properly advised Applicant of the requirement that accomplice-witness evidence be corroborated by independent evidence. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: May 21, 2008

Do not publish