Torres, Daniel ( 2009 )


Menu:














  • IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

    OF TEXAS




    NO. WR-67,975-04


    EX PARTE DANIEL TORRES, Applicant



    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

    CAUSE NO. F02-52670V IN THE 292ND DISTRICT COURT

    FROM DALLAS COUNTY


       Per curiam.

    O R D E R
      



       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. Daniel Torres v. State, No. 08-03-00152-CR, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 3441 (Tex. App.-El Paso Apr. 15, 2004, pet. ref'd).

    Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because, inter alia, counsel: (1) did not investigate the circumstances of applicant's statements to police; (2) did not move to suppress statements made to police; (3) did not introduce evidence about the source of a facial scar to rebut the State's theory that applicant received the scar at the crime scene; (4) admitted party liability in opening statements; and, (5) during closing argument, suggested applicant would re-offend upon release from confinement.

    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

    The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. Specifically, the trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress applicant's confessions based on his invocation of his right to counsel, whether the State alleged that applicant received a facial scar at the scene of the crime and, if so, whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to rebut the allegations with evidence that applicant had been scarred in a separate altercation. Additionally, the trial court shall make specific findings and conclusions as to whether trial counsel admitted party liability in opening statements, whether trial counsel suggested in closing arguments that applicant would re-offend upon future release from prison, and, if the statements were made, whether the statements constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.





    Filed: March 25, 2009

    Do not publish

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-67,975-04

Filed Date: 3/25/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015