Rice, Ex Parte Reginald Donell ( 2010 )


Menu:









  •   IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

    OF TEXAS




      NO. AP-76,426  





    EX PARTE REGINALD DONELL RICE, Applicant





    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

    CAUSE NO. 366-83058-06 IN THE 366TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

    FROM COLLIN COUNTY





               Per curiam.

     

    O P I N I O N  


                Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Rice v. State, No. 05-07-00704-CR (Tex. App. – Dallas, August 14, 2008, pet. ref’d).             Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to preserve issues regarding his motion to suppress evidence, and failed to object to the evidence when it was introduced at trial. Applicant also alleges that counsel failed to advise him that the State was seeking to enhance his punishment, and entered a plea of “true” to the enhancements on Applicant’s behalf, knowing that Applicant intended to plead “not true.”

                The trial court obtained an affidavit from trial counsel, and conducted a habeas hearing at which trial counsel testified. Based on the record, affidavits and testimony, the trial court has determined that trial counsel’s performance was deficient in that counsel failed to preserve suppression issues by objecting when the evidence was introduced at trial, by not informing Applicant of the possible range of punishment in this case, and by pleading “true” to the enhancements on Applicant’s behalf when it was Applicant’s intent to plead “not true.” The trial court also finds that such ineffective representation prejudiced Applicant. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to relief. The judgment in Cause No. 366-83058-06 from the 366th Judicial District Court of Collin County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Collin County to answer the charge against him.

                Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

     

     

    Delivered: September 29, 2010

    Do Not Publish

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,426

Filed Date: 9/29/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015