Rodriguez, Ex Parte Arturo ( 2011 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-76,587
EX PARTE ARTURO RODRIGUEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 05-CR-2067-E IN THE 357th DISTRICT COURT
FROM CAMERON COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of
murder and two counts of aggravated assault. Applicant was sentenced to imprisonment for life on
each count.
Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to
timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
2
The trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We
find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the
judgment of conviction in Cause No. 05-CR-2067-E from the 357th Judicial District Court of
Cameron County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice
of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days
of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately
appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if
the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,
should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice
of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
Delivered: June 29, 2011
Do Not Publish